Mixed-effects vs cluster-robust SEs — which do you pick?
hardAnswer
- Both handle cluster correlation, but differently.
- Mixed-effects: fully specifies covariance structure → efficient if the model is correct, but misspecification biases estimates.
- Cluster-robust SEs: model-agnostic → less efficient but robust to structure misspecification.
- Rule of thumb: use mixed effects when the hierarchical structure is real and you want cluster-specific predictions; use cluster-robust when you just want valid SEs on the fixed effects without committing to a full model.
Check yourself — multiple choice
- Random
- Mixed: fully specified covariance (efficient if correct); Cluster SEs: model-agnostic (robust). Mixed for prediction/structure; cluster SEs for inference on fixed effects
- Same thing
- Only mixed
Mixed: efficient if structure correct; cluster SE: model-agnostic, robust.
#mixed-effects#regression
Practise Statistics Fundamentals
215 interview questions in this topic.
Related questions
- What is a mixed-effects model?
- Random intercepts vs random slopes — the difference.
- Cluster-robust standard errors — when to use?
- You have 50,000 measurements from 200 patients. What is your sample size?
- Prediction interval vs confidence interval — the difference.
- What are the Gauss-Markov assumptions for OLS?